# title
Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to Thompson

# abstract
In his paper The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken problem (Nanoethics 2:305316, 2008) Paul Thompson argues that the possibility of disenhancing animals in order to improve animal welfare poses a philosophical conundrum. Although many people intuitively think such disenhancement would be morally impermissible, its difficult to find good arguments to support such intuitions. In this brief response to Thompson, I accept that theres a conundrum here. But I argue that if we seriously consider whether creating beings can harm or benefit them, and introduce the non-identity problem to discussions of animal disehancement, the conundrum is even deeper than Thompson suggests.

# authors[].organizations[].label
Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES)